Man Arrested For DUI After Breathalyzer Shows .00

Our Chicago DUI Lawyers have witnessed the crackdown on motorists suspected of DUI but we have never come across a DUI arrest this strange. In New Jersey, a motorist was arrested for DUI with a BAC of .00 – that’s right, .00!

The crackdown directed at motorists suspected of DUI continues with the full details below:

Northfield admits 0.00 blood-alcohol gets no DUI conviction

By STEVEN LEMONGELLO

http://media.pressofatlanticcity.com/smedia/2009/03/19/03/541-6992772.standalone.prod_affiliate.101.jpg

http://media.pressofatlanticcity.com/smedia/2009/03/19/03/746-6992773.standalone.prod_affiliate.101.jpg

NORTHFIELD – The city prosecutor admitted Wednesday she had no case against a Somers Point man who had been charged with drunken driving even though he registered a blood-alcohol reading of 0.00 percent.

Michele Verno dropped both the DUI charge and a reckless driving charge against Tyrone Foxworth on Wednesday in municipal court, saying she could not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Afterward, Foxworth, a black man who in 2003 led a rally against racial profiling in Linwood, and attorney Justin Laughry questioned whether race was a factor in the initial arrest.

“It’s a question in our minds,” said Laughry, “and we have to reflect on it.”

It was about 3 a.m. Nov. 27, Thanksgiving morning, when Foxworth approached a DUI checkpoint along Shore Road while driving with two friends.

Verno told Judge Matthew Powals that standard procedure at such checkpoints is for every fifth vehicle to be flagged and pulled over.

“I felt as though the stop was arbitrary,” Foxworth said Wednesday, “although I agree that there are procedures and practices they’re supposed to follow.”

When asked by police if he had been drinking, Foxworth said he answered no. He was then asked to perform a sobriety “balance” test, he said, after which he was placed under arrest for drunken driving. A Breathalyzer test, however, resulted in a blood-alcohol reading of 0.00 percent.

It was unclear whether it was alcohol or drug use that was initially suspected by police, however. Laughry said one of the passengers may have been drinking – leading to an the odor of alcohol in the car – while the arrest report by Officer Kristina Ramsi states that Foxworth was suspected of being “under the influence of alcohol/drugs.”

Northfield police Chief Robert James said only that there was a “suspicion of intoxication.”

“I don’t want to say alcohol or narcotics,” James said Wednesday.

Foxworth denies using either drugs or alcohol that night. In any event, there could be no evaluation of drug use anyway, since there was no drug-recognition expert available at the time of the arrest.

“It was a multijurisdictionalDUI checkpoint,” James said. “Officers for several departments were involved. We followed procedure and followed the guidance of the legal adviser on call that weekend.”

Foxworth, James said, “was in one of the last cars to go through the checkpoint.” Northfield does not have its own drug-recognition expert, he said, and the department had been “utilizing an officer from another agency that had already been released for the night. We were unable to locate (another) one.”

No blood or urine was taken for testing, Verno told the court – “And even if they had a drug-recognition expert, I doubt they would have,” Laughry said.

The reckless driving charge was tied directly to the DUI charge, and Powals made sure to enter into the court record that there was “no observed improper behavior” on Foxworth’s part.

“They didn’t pull him over because he was doing anything wrong,” Powals said. “It was random.”

Foxworth was one of four people to be charged with DUI that night at the checkpoint, which had been featured in a Dec. 1 story in The Press of Atlantic City examining the effectiveness of such stops.

“I presume that their endgame required me to at least get an attorney to get to the bottom of this,” Foxworth said of why he believed the charges were not dropped earlier. “I’ll be reviewing my options with my attorney how to proceed with regard to whether my constitutional rights were violated.”

Foxworth led a rally against racial profiling targeting the Linwood Police Department in 2003. He had been pulled over and charged with DUI in April 2003 by a Linwood officer who, Foxworth said, “lost his temper” and approached him “in a threatening manner.”

In an interview in January, Foxworth was more vocal about the Northfield case.

“I don’t think any other driver was stopped and got a reading of 0.00 and was issued a DUI,” he said. “My car was towed, I had to pay to get my car out and I had to hire an attorney. … The issue here is simple. I’m 47 years old, and I know that race is an issue in this country. The only way to change that is with exposure.”

The Law Offices of James E. Fabbrini have years of experience protecting people charged with DUI. From first time DUI offenders to felony DUI, our Chicago DUI lawyers have successfully fought DUI charges in Chicago and the surrounding areas.

Protect your freedom, avoid trouble, and save yourself money. Contact our office today. All consultations are absolutely free. Call us at (312) 494-3131 or e-mail us your questions at Contact@WindyCityLawFirm.com

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Free Consultation 312-494-3131

  • PERSONAL INJURY LAW
  • DUI DEFENSE
  • SUSPENDED & REVOKED LICENSES
  • EXPUNGEMENTS